Executive Summary

Urban estuaries are becoming increasingly vulnerable to flooding as sea level rise, storm surges, and extreme water events intensify, especially in regions where decades of shoreline hardening and landfilling have diminished natural flood buffers. A recent study of the San Francisco Estuary demonstrates how different adaptation strategies, engineered defenses, nature-based solutions, and localized floodgates, affect tidal dynamics and flood levels. Modeling results show that hard infrastructure can increase tidal amplification, while restored wetlands and living shorelines reduce extreme water heights, and well-designed floodgates can lower peak water levels without causing adverse effects elsewhere. The findings underscore that no single measure is sufficient; effective flood risk reduction in urban estuaries requires a coordinated, science-based blend of structural and ecological approaches. This integrated framework provides a transferable model for coastal cities worldwide as they plan for rising sea levels, stronger storms, and long-term climate resilience.

Urban Estuaries Under Increasing Climate Pressure

Urban estuaries are critical economic and ecological zones where freshwater and saltwater mix. These low-lying areas support major transportation networks, industrial facilities, and commercial hubs, yet they face intensifying exposure to high tides, storm surges, and riverine flooding. Climate change is accelerating sea level rise and increasing the frequency and severity of extreme water events, raising the urgency for new science-based adaptation strategies.

How Shoreline Modifications Have Heightened Flood Risk

A recent study by Kees Nederhoff, Rohin Saleh, Patrick L. Barnard, and Mark Stacey focuses on the San Francisco Estuary, one of the most heavily engineered estuarine systems in the United States. Decades of shoreline hardening, landfilling, and coastal development have reduced natural floodplain capacity and removed wetlands that once absorbed tidal energy. These modifications have made the region more vulnerable to both daily tidal flooding and extreme storm-driven events.

Modeling the Effectiveness of Adaptation Strategies

The research, titled “Mitigating Flood Risks in Urban Estuaries: Tidal Dynamics, Shoreline Hardening, Nature-Based Solutions, and Floodgates in San Francisco Bay,” analyzes how a combination of hard infrastructure and nature-based solutions influences water levels across the Bay. Using the Delft3D San Francisco Bay–Delta hydrodynamic model, the study simulates present-day conditions and future scenarios, including 1.5 meters of sea level rise, to better understand how shoreline design choices affect tidal amplification and flood heights.

Key Technical Findings

The study concludes that tidal amplification is a significant driver of extreme water levels under current conditions, resulting in substantial spatial differences in flooding across the estuary. Under projected sea level rise, tidal amplification decreases, generating a modest damping effect on peak water levels. Hard infrastructure, such as armoring and floodwalls, increases tidal amplification and can elevate water levels by up to 10 centimeters under a 1.5-meter sea level rise scenario. In contrast, restored wetlands and living shorelines reduce extreme water levels and, in some areas, can lower peak water levels by up to 20 centimeters. The researchers also found that localized floodgates are effective in reducing high water levels without causing harmful hydraulic impacts elsewhere in the system. The current mixture of hard and soft shoreline types produces an intermediate tidal response, underscoring the value of blended strategies.

Implications for Cities and Coastal Planners

The findings demonstrate that managing flood risk in highly urbanized estuaries requires a balanced portfolio of engineered defenses and nature-based solutions. No single approach can address the interconnected drivers of tidal amplification, storm surge, and sea level rise. Effective adaptation will require the coordinated implementation of measures across jurisdictions, with careful evaluation of ecological trade-offs, hydraulic performance, infrastructure protection, and long-term sustainability.

Applying Lessons from San Francisco Bay

For coastal engineers, urban planners, and resilience practitioners, the San Francisco Bay study offers a framework for designing and evaluating adaptation strategies that is grounded in hydrodynamic modeling and shoreline science. These insights can guide other estuaries worldwide as they confront rising sea levels, intensifying storms, and aging coastal infrastructure.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

  1. Why are urban estuaries highly vulnerable to climate-driven flooding? Urban estuaries have limited natural floodplains and often rely on hardened shorelines, which reduces their capacity to absorb tidal energy and makes them more susceptible to sea level rise, storm surges, and riverine flooding.
  2. What distinguishes hard adaptation measures from soft adaptation measures? Hard adaptation relies on engineered structures, such as floodwalls, levees, and armoring. In contrast, soft adaptation utilizes natural systems, including wetlands, tidal marshes, and living shorelines, to reduce wave energy and enhance resilience.
  3. How do nature-based solutions influence tidal dynamics? Nature-based shorelines reduce tidal amplification by restoring natural buffers that dissipate wave energy. The study found reductions in extreme water levels of up to 20 centimeters where wetlands were restored.
  4. Can floodgates mitigate extreme water levels without harming other areas? Yes. The research shows that targeted floodgates can significantly reduce local high-water levels without causing adverse hydraulic effects elsewhere in San Francisco Bay, making them a viable localized adaptation strategy.
  5. How can this research support long-term resilience planning in other estuaries? The modeling approach and findings provide a transferable framework for evaluating shoreline strategies, assessing trade-offs between different adaptation measures, and guiding evidence-based resilience planning in estuaries worldwide.

Learn more about this research in the Journal of Waterway, Port, Coastal, and Ocean Engineering: https://ascelibrary.org/doi/10.1061/JWPED5.WWENG-2342.

© 2025 American Society of Civil Engineers.

(Source: Nederhoff, K., Saleh, R., Barnard, P. L., & Stacey, M. (2025). Mitigating flood risks in urban estuaries: Tidal dynamics, shoreline hardening, nature-based solutions, and floodgates in San Francisco Bay. Journal of Waterway, Port, Coastal, and Ocean Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1061/JWPED5.WWENG-2342.)

About ClimaTwin®

Ready to get started? To learn how ClimaTwin can help you assess the physical and financial impacts of future weather and climate extremes on your infrastructure assets, capital programs, and investment portfolio, please visit www.climatwin.com today.

© 2025 ClimaTwin Corp. All rights reserved worldwide.
ClimaTwin® is a registered trademark of ClimaTwin Corp. The ClimaTwin logos, ClimaTwin Solutions™, Climate Risk Intelligence™, Climate Business Intelligence™, Future-proofing assets today for tomorrow’s climate extremes™ are trademarks of ClimaTwin Corp. All trademarks, service marks, and logos are protected by applicable laws and international treaties, and may not be used without prior written permission of ClimaTwin Corp.

###

Subscribe to the ClimaTwin Newsletter

Join us today and get exclusive updates about climate risk intelligence.

You have Successfully Subscribed!